Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 00:05

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Persona 4 Revival Officially Revealed At Xbox Games Showcase - GameSpot
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Can ancient music sound modern?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What AI tool can be used to write exactly in the human writing style?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The Universe's Most Powerful Cosmic Rays May Finally Be Explained - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.